| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2013 Kia Optima Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2013 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Kia Optima | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 OHC-4v 224 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 274 hp@6000 269 lb-ft@1750 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,794 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,656 mm | 4,844 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,831 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,620 kg | 1,535 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 70 L | -7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,336 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,156 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 955 mm | 20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,415 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,313 mm | 1,384 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 881 mm | 66 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 907 mm | 0 mm | 907 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,285 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,001 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 716 mm | 0 mm | 716 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,037 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 292 L | 436 L | -144 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 968 L | 15.4 | 952.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,792 L | 15.4 | -14.4 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima
| 2013 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
