Model Year | 2006 | 2018 | |
Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 2.4L I4 OHC-4v 119 kW@5750 220 Nm@4000 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 139 kW@6000 252 Nm@4000 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,624 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,547 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,750 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,684 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,590 kg | 1,675 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 59 L | 56 L | 3 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 988 mm | 1,008 mm | 987 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,425 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,308 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 970 mm | 991 mm | -21 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,382 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,316 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 902 mm | 1,006 mm | 901 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 0.0 | 875 L | -875 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 60.3 | 1,688 L | 59.3 |
2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
nice support for tall person and confy seating see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD |
was more comdfortable, easier entry and exiting, more shoulder hip and head room than most othersreguardless of what other manufacturers specs stated. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD |
more leg and shoulder room than most. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 220-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Adjustable, reclinable rear seat is very roomy and comfortable. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review |
2018 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-5.