| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2020 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2020 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 OHC-4v 230 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 250 hp@5000 320 lb-ft@2500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,641 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,745 kg | 1,735 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 56 L | 7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,326 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 991 mm | -18 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,425 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,006 mm | 934 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 899 mm | 0 mm | 899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,265 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 993 mm | 0 mm | 993 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 0 mm | 704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,695 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 422 L | 875 L | -453 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,025 L | 30.9 | -29.9 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,056 L | 1,688 L | 1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
| 2020 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
