| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2022 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2016 Subaru Forester Specifications
| Model Year | 2022 | 2016 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Subaru Forester | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,705 mm | 2,639 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,709 mm | 4,595 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,748 mm | 1,687 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,630 kg | 1,495 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 55 L | 60 L | -5 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,471 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,372 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,092 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 1,011 mm | 992 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,420 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,354 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 876 mm | 0 mm | 876 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,300 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,069 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 475 mm | 0 mm | 475 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,548 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,057 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 331 L | 974 L | -643 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 949 L | 34.4 | 914.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,257 L | 2,115 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2022 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2022 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Forester
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
I'm 6'3" and often don't fit comfortable in vehicles. I found this had a very nice amount of front seat room. The center console tends to stay out of the way as well, some newer designs have the center stack moving into where my right knee would be. It's a very noticeable improvement over my previous 2009 Escape. I actually found the Forester more comfortable for me than the Outback. I was expecting the opposite. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
After looking at Explorer's, I was surprised how much more room the Forester had in the back seat. Granted it doesn't have a third row, but if you don't need a 3rd row, the Forester is hard to beat in this segment for rear seat room. We can put a forward facing child seat in the back, move the front seat up a about 2 inches from all the way back and there's still plenty of front passenger room and my 1.5 year old son can't kick the back of the seat. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.0L H4 8-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
- Terrible front seat support - The cushions are too short - It's not noticeable on a test drive right away. I would not have bought the car! Test drive extensively! - Surfaces where your elbows would lay are too hard - I purchased foam pads to make it feel better. - Tall drivers like myself will struggle with the telescoping wheel's short extension range. - It is hard to get into a fully comfortable driving position. The memory seats in the XT help somewhat by retaining your seat settings if moved. - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this twice - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this THREE times! Subaru are you listening? The front seat cushions are WAY TOO SHORT! see full Subaru Forester review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
