| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2010 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
| Model | Mitsubishi Outlander | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | 3.0L V6 OHC-4v 224 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 268 hp@6200 248 lb-ft@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,656 mm | 4,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm | 1,821 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,679 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,620 kg | 1,570 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 63 L | 70 L | -7 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,336 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,039 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 960 mm | 15 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,313 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 973 mm | -26 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 907 mm | 0 mm | 907 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,285 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,001 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 716 mm | 0 mm | 716 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 292 L | 425 L | -133 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 968 L | 15.0 | 953 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,792 L | 15.0 | -14 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Camry
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Mitsubishi models.
