Mitsubishi Outlander (2009) vs. Toyota Prius (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2016 Toyota Prius specs.
2009 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2016 Toyota Prius Specifications
Model Year |
2009 |
2016 |
|
Model |
Mitsubishi Outlander |
Toyota Prius |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Hatch |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,670 mm |
2,700 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
4,641 mm |
4,539 mm |
0 mm |
Width |
1,801 mm |
1,760 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,679 mm |
1,476 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,540 kg |
1,395 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
63 L |
43 L |
20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,024 mm |
1,001 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,433 mm |
1,397 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,326 mm |
1,356 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,057 mm |
1,097 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
973 mm |
950 mm |
23 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,425 mm |
1,346 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,318 mm |
1,318 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
935 mm |
848 mm |
87 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
899 mm |
0 mm |
899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,265 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
993 mm |
0 mm |
993 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
704 mm |
0 mm |
704 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,695 mm (over 3 rows) |
1,946 mm (over 2 rows) |
1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
422 L |
697 L |
-275 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,025 L |
24.6 |
-23.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,056 L |
1,775 L |
1 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Mitsubishi models.