| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2018 Nissan Altima and 2012 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2018 | 2012 | |
| Model | Nissan Altima | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,875 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,874 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,829 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,468 mm | 1,727 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,450 kg | 1,964 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 76 L | -8 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,433 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,372 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,143 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 942 mm | 991 mm | -49 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,433 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,323 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 917 mm | 1,011 mm | 916 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,445 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,110 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 823 mm | -823 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,873 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 487 L | -51 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.4 | 1,368 L | 14.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 2,852 L | 13.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Nissan Altima
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Nissan Altima.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Mazda CX-9
| 2012 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
