| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Nissan Armada and 2015 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
| Model | Nissan Armada | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | 5.6L V8 DOHC-4v 236 kW@4900 522 Nm@3600 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 224 kW@6500 369 Nm@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,858 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,276 mm | 4,707 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 2,014 mm | 1,849 mm | 1 mm |
| Height | 1,961 mm | 1,684 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,405 kg | 1,900 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 71 L | 35 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,651 mm | 1,415 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 996 mm | -995 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,651 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,544 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 895 L | -329 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 31.6 | -30.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 1,809 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Nissan Armada
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 Nissan Armada.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 GMC Terrain
| 2015 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
