Model Year | 2015 | 2012 | |
Model | Nissan Armada | Honda Fit | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 123.2 in | 98.4 in | 24.8 in |
Length | 207.7 in | 161.6 in | 46.1 in |
Width | 79.3 in | 66.7 in | 12.6 in |
Height | 77.2 in | 60.0 in | 17.2 in |
Curb Weight | 5302 lb. | 2496 lb. | 2806 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 28.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 17.4 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.0 in | 40.4 in | 0.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 65.0 in | 52.7 in | 12.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 61.3 in | 51.5 in | 9.8 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 41.3 in | 0.5 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 40.0 in | 39.0 in | 1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 65.0 in | 51.3 in | 13.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 60.8 in | 51.3 in | 9.5 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 41.9 in | 34.5 in | 7.4 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 35.9 in | 0.0 in | 35.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 63.7 in | 0.0 in | 63.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.8 in | 0.0 in | 48.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 32.2 in | 0.0 in | 32.2 in |
Total Legroom | 115.9 in (over 3 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 40.1 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 20.0 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -0.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 56.7 ft3 | 20.6 | 36.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 97.1 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | 39.8 ft3 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Nissan Armada.
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |