Model Year | 2006 | 2019 | |
Model | Nissan Armada | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 5.6L V8 DOHC-4v 227 kW@4900 522 Nm@3600 |
turbocharged 2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 186 kW@5000 420 Nm@2000 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,697 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,255 mm | 4,549 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,002 mm | 1,842 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,976 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,382 kg | 1,735 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 56 L | 50 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,654 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,638 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,527 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 1,006 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 875 L | -309 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 30.9 | -29.9 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 1,688 L | 1 L |
2006 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
2006 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not enough legroom and headroom in 3rd row seat. see full Nissan Armada review |
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.