Model Year | 2007 | 2015 | |
Model | Nissan Armada | Nissan Murano | |
Engine | 5.6L V8 DOHC-4v 236 kW@4900 522 Nm@3600 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 194 kW@6000 325 Nm@4400 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,129 mm | 2,824 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,255 mm | 4,897 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 2,002 mm | 1,915 mm | 1 mm |
Height | 1,976 mm | 1,692 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,382 kg | 1,778 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 106 L | 72 L | 34 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,041 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,654 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,557 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,107 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,016 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,638 mm | 1,494 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,527 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,064 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,618 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,240 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 818 mm | 0 mm | 818 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,944 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,090 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 566 L | 1,121 L | 565 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,606 L | 39.6 | -38.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,750 L | 1,979 L | 1 L |
2007 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room. see full Nissan Armada review |
2007 Nissan Armada Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not enough legroom and headroom in 3rd row seat. see full Nissan Armada review |
2015 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Nissan Murano.