Model Year | 2007 | 2016 | |
Model | Nissan Frontier | GMC Terrain | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2007 Nissan Frontier Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 154-horsepower 2.5L I4 5-speed manual RWD |
I love the front seats, good leg room and I am 6 foot 1 inch tall. Seat material on my XE was rather rough so I put on seat covers that had a softer material and that felt more comfortable. see full Nissan Frontier review |
2006 | 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 265-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
large extra cab. Lots of room compared to a Tacoma see full Nissan Frontier review |
2006 | 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 265-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
comfortable seats see full Nissan Frontier review |
2007 Nissan Frontier Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr Crew Cab 5ft bed 265-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat room was less than Tacoma. Stiff. see full Nissan Frontier review |
2016 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |