Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
Model | Nissan JUKE | Chrysler 200 | |
Engine | turbocharged 1.6L I4 DOHC-4v 188 hp@5600 177 lb-ft@2000 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 295 hp@6350 262 lb-ft@4250 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable CVT | 9-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,530 mm | 2,743 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,125 mm | 4,884 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,765 mm | 1,869 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,570 mm | 1,491 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,283 kg | 1,640 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 46 L | 60 L | -14 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 958 mm | 22 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,361 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,384 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,072 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 932 mm | 950 mm | -18 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,306 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,339 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 815 mm | 955 mm | -140 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,885 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,027 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 252 L | 453 L | -201 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 830 L | 16.0 | 814 L |
2011 Nissan JUKE Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 188hp 1.6L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
If there are leggy people in the front the room in the back goes to almost non-existant. The head room is limited for taller people as well. see full Nissan JUKE review |
2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 188hp 1.6L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
The back seat is useless for adults. At 6' tall I couldn't sit in the back because my head would hit the roof. see full Nissan JUKE review |
2011 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 188hp 1.6L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
The front seats are great for short trips, but found them rather hard and uncomfortable for longer trips. Not usually a problem as you have to stop every two hundred miles to fill it up again. see full Nissan JUKE review |
2015 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chrysler 200.