| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Nissan Maxima and 2019 GMC Terrain Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2019 | |
| Model | Nissan Maxima | GMC Terrain | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 290 hp@6400 261 lb-ft@4400 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 252 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@2500 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable CVT | 9-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 107.3 in | 2 in |
| Length | 190.6 in | 182.3 in | 8.3 in |
| Width | 73.2 in | 72.4 in | 0.8 in |
| Height | 57.8 in | 65.4 in | -7.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3556 lb. | 3563 lb. | -7 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 14.9 gal. | 5.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 40.0 in | -1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 57.2 in | -0.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 53.4 in | 54.4 in | -1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.8 in | 40.9 in | 2.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 38.5 in | -2.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.1 in | 55.6 in | -0.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 51.8 in | 2.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.6 in | 39.7 in | -5.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.4 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -2.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 14.2 ft3 | 29.6 ft3 | -15.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.2 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | -49.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan Maxima
| 2010 Nissan Maxima Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
Lumbar in the base model. Good side bolstering on bottom cushion and through the shoulders. Large range of adjustment and the wheel tilts and shifts. see full Nissan Maxima review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
Lots of room, soft seats. see full Nissan Maxima review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
Bucket seats hold you in around corners - very supportive. Telescopic steering wheel and power seats ensure you get a great driving position. Both seats and steering wheel are heated. Dual climate control great for passengers. see full Nissan Maxima review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
It fits everywhere. On a recent trip, I drove all day and was never "seat tired". see full Nissan Maxima review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
Adjustable everything! Air conditioned driver seat a huge consideration. see full Nissan Maxima review |
| 2010 Nissan Maxima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
My tall friends hit there heads on the roofline, they are over 6 foot see full Nissan Maxima review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 290-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
The rear seat of the 7th gen Maxima is slightly smaller than that of the 6th gen Maxima. Still fairly roomy, but slightly smaller. This is understandable because of the major styling change, and the conversion from 'near luxury family sedan' back to 'near luxury family sedan with a sporty edge' that took place between these generations. see full Nissan Maxima review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
| 2019 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 GMC Terrain.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
