Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
Model | Nissan Murano | Ford Expedition | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
5.4L V8 OHC-3v 300 hp@5000 365 lb-ft@3750 |
|
Transmission | 7-speed shiftable CVT | 4-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 3,023 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,897 mm | 5,227 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,915 mm | 1,999 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,692 mm | 1,948 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,719 kg | 2,428 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 106 L | -34 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,514 mm | 1,610 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,600 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,107 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,494 mm | 1,633 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,585 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 983 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 970 mm | -970 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,527 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,384 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,090 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,951 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,121 L | 586 L | -585 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 39.6 | 1,724 L | 38.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,979 L | 3,129 L | -2 L |
2016 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano.
2006 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of leg room in 2nd and 3rd row. see full Ford Expedition review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
room to get comfortable on long trips; e-z access to coffee, my phone, my wallet; birds-eye view of the road see full Ford Expedition review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Like sitting in your favorite easy chair in your living room. see full Ford Expedition review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of space for larger people and lots of space between front passenger and driver. see full Ford Expedition review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Can fit two adults and a car seat in the second row seat. Third row is just as comfortable. see full Ford Expedition review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Lots of leg room! see full Ford Expedition review |
2006 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr SUV, ext. 300-horsepower 5.4L V8 6-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Hard and flat. see full Ford Expedition review |