Model Year | 2015 | 2012 | |
Model | Nissan Murano | Ford Taurus | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
turbocharged 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 365 hp@5500 350 lb-ft@3500 |
|
Transmission | 7-speed shiftable CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,897 mm | 5,154 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,915 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,692 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,778 kg | 2,003 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 76 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,514 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,107 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 960 mm | -959 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,494 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 968 mm | 15 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,090 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 1,121 L | 569 L | -568 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,979 L | 20.1 | -19.1 L |
2015 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Nissan Murano.
2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |