Model Year | 2011 | 2015 | |
Model | Nissan Murano | GMC Terrain | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 301 hp@6500 272 lb-ft@4800 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 2,858 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,788 mm | 4,707 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,882 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,702 mm | 1,684 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,818 kg | 1,900 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 82 L | 71 L | 11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,514 mm | 1,415 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,107 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 996 mm | -995 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,514 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 922 mm | 1,013 mm | 921 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,029 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,060 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 923 L | 895 L | 28 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,311 L | 1,809 L | 1 L |
2011 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 CVT AWD |
You can fit comfortably 3 adults across the back (for short to medium trips) or two car seats and one adult. see full Nissan Murano review |
2010 | 4dr SUV 265-horsepower 3.5L V6 CVT AWD |
Hip point makes easy entry/egress. Supports my 265 pound frame. Offers enough leg/hip/shoulder room. Seats are heated, which is great in the cold Arctic. Many choices of moving/tilting helps me get a comfortable position at all times whild driving! see full Nissan Murano review |
2015 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 301-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat room is plentiful, and because rear seat can be slid forward and back, you can shift between needing more leg room and using more of the cargo area. We had traded in a 2015 Dodge Journey for the Terrain, because of safety concerns, but realized after we had it for awhile, the rear seat of the Journey was not able to go back far enough into the cargo area, and because of the bulky and high mounted head rests, you felt trapped. The Terrain does not have these issues and feels much more roomy and comfortable. The rear seats are supportive and not at all like some back seats that feel like they were an afterthought. see full GMC Terrain review |