Model Year | 2014 | 2009 | |
Model | Nissan Murano | Mazda CX-7 | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 194 kW@6000 325 Nm@4400 |
turbocharged 2.3L I4 DOHC-4v 182 kW@5000 350 Nm@2500 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 2,751 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,788 mm | 4,674 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,882 mm | 1,872 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,702 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,818 kg | 1,782 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 82 L | 69 L | 13 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,019 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,514 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,107 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,514 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 922 mm | 925 mm | -3 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,029 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 923 L | 847 L | 76 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,311 L | 1,659 L | 1 L |
2014 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Nissan Murano.
2009 Mazda CX-7 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats in rear are tight, they do not slide or recline where as Honda CRV rear seats are much more flexible for kids and families. My crv is 2007 and the rear seats recline and the entire bench can slide front and back to create instant leg room see full Mazda CX-7 review |