Model Year | 2007 | 2013 | |
Model | Nissan Pathfinder | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 104.3 in | 7.9 in |
Length | 187.6 in | 173.6 in | 14 in |
Width | 72.8 in | 72.0 in | 0.8 in |
Height | 72.4 in | 63.9 in | 8.5 in |
Curb Weight | 4373 lb. | 3607 lb. | 766 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 21.1 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 7.6 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 41.0 in | -1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 55.9 in | 2.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.5 in | 54.3 in | 1.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 40.4 in | 2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.9 in | 39.4 in | 0.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.4 in | 55.2 in | 3.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.6 in | 51.9 in | 5.7 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 34.2 in | 36.5 in | -2.3 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 36.7 in | 0.0 in | 36.7 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.1 in | 0.0 in | 57.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 44.0 in | 0.0 in | 44 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 28.1 in | 0.0 in | 28.1 in |
Total Legroom | 104.7 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 27.8 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.5 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 49.2 ft3 | 24.5 | 24.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 79.2 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 26.6 ft3 |
2007 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 266-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
The third row seating is only good for small children. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat is cramped. I would gladly give up the third row seat, for more room for the rear (2nd row) seats. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seating is small for long hauls, and seats WAY too hard see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.