| Model Year | 2000 | 2012 | |
| Model | Nissan Pathfinder | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
| 2000 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2001 | 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
It gives enough space for lots of legs see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2000 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2001 | 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
After the warranty expired the seats stopped being able to move at all and the cushioning squashed making it extremely uncomfortable for extended driving see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |