| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Nissan Pathfinder and 2013 Ford Transit Connect Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
| Model | Nissan Pathfinder | Ford Transit Connect | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Minivan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,850 mm | 2,911 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,765 mm | 4,590 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,849 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,839 mm | 2,014 mm | -1 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,984 kg | 1,554 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L | 58 L | 22 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,016 mm | 1,298 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,481 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,410 mm | 1,290 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 1,283 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,483 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,519 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 869 mm | 978 mm | -109 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 932 mm | 0 mm | 932 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,450 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,118 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 714 mm | 0 mm | 714 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,659 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 467 L | 2,212 L | 465 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,393 L | 78.1 | -77.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,243 L | 3,831 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Pathfinder
| 2006 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat is cramped. I would gladly give up the third row seat, for more room for the rear (2nd row) seats. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seating is small for long hauls, and seats WAY too hard see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
| 2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
