| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Nissan Pathfinder and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | |
| Model | Nissan Pathfinder | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 98.4 in | 13.8 in |
| Length | 187.6 in | 161.6 in | 26 in |
| Width | 72.8 in | 66.7 in | 6.1 in |
| Height | 72.4 in | 60.0 in | 12.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4373 lb. | 2496 lb. | 1877 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.1 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 10.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 40.4 in | -0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 52.7 in | 5.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.5 in | 51.5 in | 4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 41.3 in | 1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.9 in | 39.0 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.4 in | 51.3 in | 7.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.6 in | 51.3 in | 6.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.2 in | 34.5 in | -0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 36.7 in | 0.0 in | 36.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.1 in | 0.0 in | 57.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 44.0 in | 0.0 in | 44 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 28.1 in | 0.0 in | 28.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 104.7 in (over 3 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 28.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.5 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -4.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 49.2 ft3 | 20.6 | 28.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 79.2 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | 21.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Pathfinder
| 2006 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat is cramped. I would gladly give up the third row seat, for more room for the rear (2nd row) seats. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seating is small for long hauls, and seats WAY too hard see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
