| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Nissan Pathfinder and 2015 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
| Model | Nissan Pathfinder | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in | 106.3 in | 5.9 in |
| Length | 187.6 in | 176.4 in | 11.2 in |
| Width | 72.8 in | 68.7 in | 4.1 in |
| Height | 72.4 in | 58.7 in | 13.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 4373 lb. | 3042 lb. | 1331 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 21.1 gal. | 11.9 gal. | 9.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 38.6 in | 1.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.3 in | 54.9 in | 3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.5 in | 52.7 in | 2.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.5 in | -0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.9 in | 37.6 in | 2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.4 in | 53.1 in | 5.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.6 in | 51.2 in | 6.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.2 in | 36.0 in | -1.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 36.7 in | 0.0 in | 36.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.1 in | 0.0 in | 57.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 44.0 in | 0.0 in | 44 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 28.1 in | 0.0 in | 28.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 104.7 in (over 3 rows) | 78.5 in (over 2 rows) | 26.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.5 ft3 | 21.6 ft3 | -5.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 49.2 ft3 | 21.6 | 27.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 79.2 ft3 | 39.6 ft3 | 39.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Pathfinder
| 2006 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat is cramped. I would gladly give up the third row seat, for more room for the rear (2nd row) seats. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seating is small for long hauls, and seats WAY too hard see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
| 2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
