| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Nissan Quest and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
| Model | Nissan Quest | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 355 hp@5600 383 lb-ft@4100 |
|
| Transmission | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.1 in | 116.0 in | 2.1 in |
| Length | 200.8 in | 204.0 in | -3.2 in |
| Width | 77.6 in | 80.5 in | -2.9 in |
| Height | 71.5 in | 74.4 in | -2.9 in |
| Curb Weight | 4367 lb. | 5466 lb. | -1099 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 20.0 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 42.1 in | 42.8 in | -0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 64.5 in | 64.8 in | -0.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.3 in | 60.8 in | -3.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.8 in | 45.3 in | -1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 41.6 in | 38.7 in | 2.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 63.2 in | 65.1 in | -1.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 66.0 in | 60.3 in | 5.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.7 in | 39.0 in | -2.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 40.0 in | 38.1 in | 1.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.2 in | 62.6 in | -1.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 49.6 in | 49.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 40.5 in | 24.8 in | 15.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 121 in (over 3 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | 11.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 35.1 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | 19.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 63.6 ft3 | 51.6 ft3 | 12 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 108.4 ft3 | 94.7 ft3 | 13.7 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Nissan Quest
| 2013 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2014 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 260-horsepower 3.5L V6 CVT FWD |
Here's the main reason I bought this van: my kids! Of all the vans we tested, they believed the second and third row seats were the most comfortable. Some may laugh at the boxy shape and fat rear end of the Quest, but the reason it's designed that way is because it maximizes interior room. I'm 6'1" (taller in the torso than legs) and even I think the van is spacious when I sit in the third row. The head and shoulder room is incredible. The seats are all very comfortable. The soft suspension makes riding as a passenger a pleasure. So, despite all the shortcomings I mention in this review, in my opinion, the Quest tops all the competitors in the category of passenger and driver comfort. The pleasing and luxurious interior materials contribute to this. Too bad the production of this iteration of the Quest appears to be in its final chapter. see full Nissan Quest review |
| 2012 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 260-horsepower 3.5L V6 CVT FWD |
. see full Nissan Quest review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
