Model Year | 2006 | 2013 | |
Model | Nissan Quest | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 124.0 in | 104.3 in | 19.7 in |
Length | 204.1 in | 173.6 in | 30.5 in |
Width | 77.6 in | 72.0 in | 5.6 in |
Height | 71.9 in | 63.9 in | 8 in |
Curb Weight | 4012 lb. | 3607 lb. | 405 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 20.1 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 6.6 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 41.9 in | 41.0 in | 0.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 63.7 in | 55.9 in | 7.8 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 65.6 in | 54.3 in | 11.3 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 40.4 in | 1.3 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 41.7 in | 39.4 in | 2.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 66.2 in | 55.2 in | 11 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 67.4 in | 51.9 in | 15.5 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 41.3 in | 36.5 in | 4.8 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.6 in | 0.0 in | 37.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 61.6 in | 0.0 in | 61.6 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 50.0 in | 0.0 in | 50 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 41.2 in | 0.0 in | 41.2 in |
Total Legroom | 124.2 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 47.3 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 32.3 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | 7.8 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 87.7 ft3 | 24.5 | 63.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 148.7 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 96.1 ft3 |
2006 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bench back seems kinds stiff after sitting in the captains chairs.That is one thing they could improve. see full Nissan Quest review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
MOST COMFORTABLE VEHICLE FOR 7 PASSENGERS AND THE SKYVIEW MAKES A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. NISSAN RELIABILITY OF THE 3.5L IS RESOUNDING.IF THEY CAN ONLY FIX THE ROTOR ISSUE IT WOULD BE THE BEST VAN ON THE MARKET see full Nissan Quest review |
2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.