Model Year | 2006 | 2014 | |
Model | Nissan Quest | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 179 kW@5800 328 Nm@4400 |
2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 137 kW@5700 251 Nm@3250 |
|
Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,150 mm | 2,700 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,184 mm | 4,539 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,971 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,826 mm | 1,669 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,820 kg | 1,531 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 56 L | 20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,618 mm | 1,461 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,666 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,059 mm | 991 mm | -990 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,681 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,712 mm | 1,364 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,049 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 955 mm | 0 mm | 955 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,565 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,270 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 1,046 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Total Legroom | 3,155 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,040 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 915 L | 966 L | -51 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,483 L | 34.1 | -32.1 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,211 L | 1,835 L | 3 L |
2006 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bench back seems kinds stiff after sitting in the captains chairs.That is one thing they could improve. see full Nissan Quest review |
2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
MOST COMFORTABLE VEHICLE FOR 7 PASSENGERS AND THE SKYVIEW MAKES A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. NISSAN RELIABILITY OF THE 3.5L IS RESOUNDING.IF THEY CAN ONLY FIX THE ROTOR ISSUE IT WOULD BE THE BEST VAN ON THE MARKET see full Nissan Quest review |
2014 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | There's plenty of legroom in the rear seat, but the same can be said of most compact crossovers. Based on the official specs the Mazda has 4.4 inches more total legroom than a VW Tiguan, but to me the Tiguan's rear seat seemed slightly roomier and more comfortable owing to a higher position. The rear seat reclines in the VW and some other compact crossovers, but not in the Mazda. The Escape's rear seat is considerably less spacious than the others. Adults will fit, but with less knee room to spare. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
2014 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
2013 | There's no clear winner in rear seat room and comfort, either. The Mazda's rear seat is mounted a little lower than the Toyota's, and when sitting in it my knees are considerably closer (if still not close) to the front seat backs. Also, the Toyota's rear seat reclines, while the Mazda's does not. Neither car has air vents in the rear passenger compartment, but the RAV4 has a large vent high on the instrument panel apparently intended to push cool air into the rear seat via the ceiling. To counter these RAV4 advantages, the CX-5 offers about five inches more rear hip room. So three passengers will fit more comfortably. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
2014 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2015 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Soon after I bought the Mazda, I did an 8 hour trip in it. I found the seat comfort to be most satisfactory. I had no trouble finding a comfortable driving position using the power seat, and, the lumbar support. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
2014 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2014 | 4dr SUV 184-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
While recently shopping for a new car for the first time in over 10 years, I found that driver's seats are now made with high sides. For me, a 5'1" female driver, this makes it a bit awkward getting in and out. Combined with the higher ground clearance of a compact SUV, it's not the ideal setup. The Mazda CX-5 is not as bad as others, but it's still an issue. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
2013 | 4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Could use some more support on the front of the seats, the back seems to fully support me. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
2013 | 4dr SUV 155-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seat is roomy enough for an average or above average adult, but the seats themselves could be better-- perhaps more sculpted and padded. Not nearly as comfortable as the front seats after an hour or two. I'm sure, however, that this is a common complaint on other smaller SUVs too, having tried them out at dealers, so it's not unique to Mazda. Again, a modest complaint since I'm in the driver's seat most of the time! (which is VERY comfortable, I might add, even for long drives!) see full Mazda CX-5 review |