| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Nissan Quest and 2017 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2017 | |
| Model | Nissan Quest | Toyota Prius | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 3,150 mm | 2,700 mm | 1 mm |
| Length | 5,184 mm | 4,539 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,971 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,826 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,820 kg | 1,395 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 43 L | 33 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,618 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,666 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,059 mm | 950 mm | -949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,681 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,712 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,049 mm | 848 mm | -847 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 955 mm | 0 mm | 955 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,565 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,270 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 1,046 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Total Legroom | 3,155 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 915 L | 697 L | 218 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,483 L | 24.6 | -22.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,211 L | 1,775 L | 3 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Quest
| 2006 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The bench back seems kinds stiff after sitting in the captains chairs.That is one thing they could improve. see full Nissan Quest review |
| 2005 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 240-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
MOST COMFORTABLE VEHICLE FOR 7 PASSENGERS AND THE SKYVIEW MAKES A WORLD OF DIFFERENCE. NISSAN RELIABILITY OF THE 3.5L IS RESOUNDING.IF THEY CAN ONLY FIX THE ROTOR ISSUE IT WOULD BE THE BEST VAN ON THE MARKET see full Nissan Quest review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
See TrueDelta's information for all Minivans
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
