Model Year | 2009 | 2017 | |
Model | Nissan Quest | Toyota Prius | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 175 kW@5800 325 Nm@4400 |
1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 71 kW@5200 142 Nm@3600 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | CVT | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Minivan, ext. | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 3,150 mm | 2,700 mm | 1 mm |
Length | 5,184 mm | 4,539 mm | 1 mm |
Width | 1,971 mm | 1,760 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,826 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,946 kg | 1,395 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 43 L | 33 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,618 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,666 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,097 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,059 mm | 950 mm | -949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,681 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,712 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,069 mm | 848 mm | -847 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 955 mm | 0 mm | 955 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,565 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,270 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 1,006 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Total Legroom | 3,134 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 915 L | 697 L | 218 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 2,483 L | 24.6 | -22.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 4,126 L | 1,775 L | 3 L |
2009 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
Superior to other minivans in ease of entry, available legroom, and comfort. see full Nissan Quest review |
2009 Nissan Quest Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 235-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed automatic FWD |
The seat is not as comfortable as Chrysler or Toyota. This is not an issue except for very long trips (6-8 hrs). see full Nissan Quest review |
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review |
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.