Nissan Sentra (2010) vs. Kia Optima (2013) Specs

vs.

◆

2010 Nissan Sentra and 2013 Kia Optima Specifications

Model Year	2010	2013
Model	Nissan Sentra	Kia Optima
Engine	2.5L I4 DOHC-4v 200 hp@6600 180 lb-ft@5200	turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 274 hp@6000 269 lb-ft@1750
Transmission	6-speed manual	6-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	FWD	FWD
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr Sedan
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,685 mm	2,794 mm	0 mm
Length	4,567 mm	4,844 mm	0 mm
Width	1,791 mm	1,831 mm	0 mm
Height	1,511 mm	1,455 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	1,396 kg	1,535 kg	0 kg
Fuel Capacity	55 L	70 L	-15 L
Headroom, Row 1	1,031 mm	1,016 mm	0 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,445 mm	1,453 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,374 mm	1,389 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,077 mm	1,156 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	947 mm	955 mm	-8 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,400 mm	1,415 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,346 mm	1,384 mm	0 mm
Legroom, Row 2	876 mm	881 mm	-5 mm
Total Legroom	1,953 mm (over 2 rows)	2,037 mm (over 2 rows)	-1 mm
Cargo Volume	371 L	436 L	-65 L

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Nissan Sentra.

2013 Kia Optima Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	The Optima's rear seat is comfortably shaped, and includes plenty of room for passengers to stretch out their legs. Heads are a different matter. Though I'm only 5-9, if I still had much hair it would have been brushing the headliner. The Fusion provides a little more rear headroom, but less knee room. Buyers seeking a rear seat suitable for large adults won't be happy with this aspect of either car. see full Kia Optima review

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Kia Optima.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.