Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | |
Model | Nissan Titan | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2006 Nissan Titan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The captain chairs are far and away more comfortable than bench seats. see full Nissan Titan review |
2006 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Same as the front, lots of room for full size adults. see full Nissan Titan review |
2006 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Huge back seat. Very comfortable for any size adult. see full Nissan Titan review |
2005 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room and most usable room with seats folded up. Seats folded up out of the way instead of folding down using up floor to ceiling room. see full Nissan Titan review |
2006 Nissan Titan Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2005 | 4dr Extended Cab 6.5ft bed 305-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
The rear bench is simply uncomfortable. Long trips (an hour or longer) are not recommended in the back seat. see full Nissan Titan review |
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |