| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Nissan Titan and 2009 Mazda CX-7 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2009 | |
| Model | Nissan Titan | Mazda CX-7 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Nissan Titan
| 2010 Nissan Titan Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Crew Cab 7ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Extremely roomy and comfortable. see full Nissan Titan review |
| 2009 | 4dr Crew Cab 7ft bed 317-horsepower 5.6L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
I carry two kids every day-I needed a large backseat. Additionally, I can fit a third car seat in quite easily-good if a relative or another child is with us. see full Nissan Titan review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mazda CX-7
| 2009 Mazda CX-7 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 244hp 2.3L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats in rear are tight, they do not slide or recline where as Honda CRV rear seats are much more flexible for kids and families. My crv is 2007 and the rear seats recline and the entire bench can slide front and back to create instant leg room see full Mazda CX-7 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Pickups
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.
