Nissan cube Nissan cube 2012 Mazda CX-3 Mazda CX-3 2017

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Nissan cube (2012) vs. Mazda CX-3 (2017) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2012 Nissan cube and 2017 Mazda CX-3 specs.

2012 Nissan cube and 2017 Mazda CX-3 Specifications

Model Year 2012 2017  
Model Nissan cube Mazda CX-3  
Engine 1.8L I4
DOHC-4v
122 hp@5200
127 lb-ft@4800
2.0L I4
DOHC-4v
146 hp@6000
146 lb-ft@2800
 
Transmission 6-speed manual 6-speed shiftable automatic  
Drivetrain FWD FWD  
Body 4dr Hatch 4dr SUV  
      Difference
Wheelbase 99.6 in 101.2 in -1.6 in
Length 156.5 in 168.3 in -11.8 in
Width 66.7 in 69.6 in -2.9 in
Height 65.0 in 60.7 in 4.3 in
Curb Weight 2762 lb. 2809 lb. -47 lb.
Fuel Capacity 13.2 gal. 12.7 gal. 0.5 gal.
Headroom, Row 1 42.6 in 38.4 in 4.2 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1 52.2 in 53.5 in -1.3 in
Hip Room, Row 1 48.8 in 52.3 in -3.5 in
Legroom, Row 1 42.4 in 41.7 in 0.7 in
Headroom, Row 2 40.2 in 37.2 in 3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2 52.4 in 50.4 in 2 in
Hip Room, Row 2 47.6 in 49.0 in -1.4 in
Legroom, Row 2 35.5 in 35.0 in 0.5 in
Total Legroom 77.9 in (over 2 rows) 76.7 in (over 2 rows) 1.2 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum 11.4 ft3 12.4 ft3 -1 ft3
Cargo Volume, Maximum 58.1 ft3 44.5 ft3 13.6 ft3

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Nissan cube

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Nissan cube.

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearComment
2016 The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring. The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO. Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest. see full Mazda CX-3 review
2017 Mazda CX-3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable. The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference. According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows. see full Mazda CX-3 review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Mazda CX-3.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Nissan models.