Pontiac Montana SV6 (2006) vs. Toyota Prius (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Pontiac Montana SV6 and 2016 Toyota Prius specs.
2006 Pontiac Montana SV6 and 2016 Toyota Prius Specifications
| Model Year |
2006 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Pontiac Montana SV6 |
Toyota Prius |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Minivan, ext. |
4dr Hatch |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
3,076 mm |
2,700 mm |
1 mm |
| Length |
5,222 mm |
4,539 mm |
1 mm |
| Width |
1,829 mm |
1,760 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,829 mm |
1,476 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,985 kg |
1,395 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
95 L |
43 L |
52 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
1,011 mm |
1,001 mm |
0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,521 mm |
1,397 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
0 mm |
1,356 mm |
-1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,013 mm |
1,097 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
988 mm |
950 mm |
38 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,554 mm |
1,346 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
0 mm |
1,318 mm |
-1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
988 mm |
848 mm |
140 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 |
968 mm |
0 mm |
968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,234 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 |
919 mm |
0 mm |
919 mm |
| Total Legroom |
2,921 mm (over 3 rows) |
1,946 mm (over 2 rows) |
1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
762 L |
697 L |
65 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
2,110 L |
24.6 |
-22.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
3,865 L |
1,775 L |
2 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Pontiac Montana SV6
| 2005 |
4dr Minivan, ext. 200-horsepower 3.5L V6
4-speed automatic FWD |
Front seats are very comfortable and roomy compared to the Chrysler Town and Country
see full Pontiac Montana SV6 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
| 2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
| 2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
MinivansSee TrueDelta's information for all
Pontiac models.
