| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Scion tC and 2003 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2003 | |
| Model | Scion tC | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Scion tC
| 2010 Scion tC Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
A fastback car with actual usable back seats! Coupes tend to have cramped back setas, but in this case it is very comfortable sitting in the back for extended periods of time. see full Scion tC review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Taurus
| 2003 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Big and cavernous, would hold three adults easily! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2004 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
There is room, but not so much room that I feel lost (as in the newer Taurus-former 500). see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2002 | 4dr Sedan 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior has tons of space for a car, nuff said. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2002 | 4dr Wagon 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Very comfortable with adjustable lumbar for driver. Can sit up high for good visibility. Ride in great comfort on long trips in these seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2003 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2002 | 4dr Wagon 200-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
No rear head rests. Plain design is just not as comfortable as the fronts. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Scion models.
