| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Subaru Forester and 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2015 | |
| Model | Subaru Forester | BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo | |
| Engine | turbocharged 2.5L H4 DOHC-4v 169 kW@5600 319 Nm@3600 |
turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 224 kW@5800 407 Nm@1300 |
|
| Transmission | 4-speed automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,525 mm | 2,921 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,486 mm | 4,826 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,735 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,651 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,520 kg | 1,819 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 60 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,011 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,359 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,311 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,107 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 973 mm | -972 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,361 mm | 1,374 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,311 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 856 mm | 996 mm | -140 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,963 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,062 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 906 L | 518 L | 388 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 32.0 | 521 L | -489 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,634 L | 1,600 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru Forester
| 2006 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
easy to find comfortable position; no problems driving over an hour or more; good upright position see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
There is leg room. The seat is adjustable enough. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2006 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 224hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
Front driver leg room is a little cramped from side to side. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
No thigh or lumbar support, seats hrad, minimal leg room for front passenger see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Not acceptable for an adult in any of the three rear seating positions see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
Again, cramped and too small for larger people. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 230hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD |
This is honesty the only complaint i have about the 2006 XT. The rear seat is a bit tight. We took three other adults on about a 4 hour trip and it was a tight fit - good thing we're good friends! My wife's 2009 Forester is much better in the rear legroom department. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Rear seat is just too small, but that has been fixed for the 2009 models. The front seat, actually the cabin of the car is just a bit too narrow. It needs more elbow room. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Not enough elbow room. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD |
Rear seat room is a bit tight for larger people. Car seats are a little tight in both rear and forward facing positions. see full Subaru Forester review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
| 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2014 | Though the latest 3-Series has a much roomier back seat than its predecessors, many people still find it insufficient for their needs, and step up to a midsize sedan or wagon such as the 5-Series or E-Class. Well, most of the 3-Series Gran Turismo's wheelbase stretch was put towards rear seat legroom, bumping it from 35.0 to 37.9 inches. Though a larger car, the E-Class has nearly four inches less total legroom--barely more than the 3 wagon, in fact. (But with a more comfortably positioned rear seat than the 3 wagon.) What the specs don't tell you is that the 3 GT's rear seat cushion, since it is positioned much higher than that in the wagons, provides better thigh support and a much more open view forward. To top it off, the 3 GT's rear seat back reclines. Here again, though, the E-Class wagon has a trick bonus: a rear-facing third-row seat. Though there's not enough headroom back there for anyone over 5-4, the seat is well-padded. If you want to seat seven in a pinch, the E-Class wagon is your only option with a sedan-like driving position (aside from the Tesla Model S). Update: this review originally stated that the 3GT has much more shoulder room than the regular 3-Series, and about as much as the E-Class. But it seems that the initial specs were inaccurate. The latest specs suggest shoulder room in the 3GT is about the same as that in the regular 3-Series. Its interior does feel significantly roomier, though, so the initial specs could yet provide the more accurate set. see full BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 BMW 3-Series Gran Turismo.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.
