| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Subaru Forester and 2013 Chevrolet Spark Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2013 | |
| Model | Subaru Forester | Chevrolet Spark | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,639 mm | 2,375 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,595 mm | 3,675 mm | 1 mm |
| Width | 1,796 mm | 1,598 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,687 mm | 1,549 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,495 kg | 1,029 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 60 L | 35 L | 25 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,052 mm | 1,001 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,448 mm | 1,288 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,219 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,092 mm | 1,067 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,011 mm | 947 mm | -946 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,435 mm | 1,262 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,207 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 894 mm | 71 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,057 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 974 L | 323 L | 651 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,115 L | 883 L | -881 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Forester
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
I'm 6'3" and often don't fit comfortable in vehicles. I found this had a very nice amount of front seat room. The center console tends to stay out of the way as well, some newer designs have the center stack moving into where my right knee would be. It's a very noticeable improvement over my previous 2009 Escape. I actually found the Forester more comfortable for me than the Outback. I was expecting the opposite. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2015 | 4dr SUV 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 CVT AWD |
After looking at Explorer's, I was surprised how much more room the Forester had in the back seat. Granted it doesn't have a third row, but if you don't need a 3rd row, the Forester is hard to beat in this segment for rear seat room. We can put a forward facing child seat in the back, move the front seat up a about 2 inches from all the way back and there's still plenty of front passenger room and my 1.5 year old son can't kick the back of the seat. see full Subaru Forester review |
| 2016 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 250hp 2.0L H4 8-speed shiftable CVT AWD |
- Terrible front seat support - The cushions are too short - It's not noticeable on a test drive right away. I would not have bought the car! Test drive extensively! - Surfaces where your elbows would lay are too hard - I purchased foam pads to make it feel better. - Tall drivers like myself will struggle with the telescoping wheel's short extension range. - It is hard to get into a fully comfortable driving position. The memory seats in the XT help somewhat by retaining your seat settings if moved. - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this twice - Front seat cushions are too short - Yes I said this THREE times! Subaru are you listening? The front seat cushions are WAY TOO SHORT! see full Subaru Forester review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Spark
| 2013 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Spark.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.
