Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport 2006 Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport (2006) vs. Ford Ranger (2003) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport and 2003 Ford Ranger specs.

2006 Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport and 2003 Ford Ranger Specifications

Model Year 2006 2003  
Model Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport Ford Ranger  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport

2006 Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2006 4dr Wagon 173-horsepower 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
Body hugging front seats see full Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport review
2006 Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2007 4dr Sedan 173-horsepower 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
I know it is a smaller sedan, but even with the front seats shoved up to that your knees are in the dashboard, that leaves just enough room for an average human in back. Under normal front seat conditions, crushed knees in back. see full Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport review
2006 4dr Sedan turbocharged 230hp 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
Seats are very large and not built for comfort for a thinner person. see full Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport review
2006 4dr Wagon turbocharged 230hp 2.5L H4
5-speed manual AWD
The rear seat leg room is too small for American sized adults. A little more room would have made this car a lot more livable when family comes to town. This may be THE reason why I upgrade to a midsize car once this car dies. see full Subaru Impreza / WRX / Outback Sport review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Ranger

2003 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
The jump seats in a Ranger are not very practical for long trips what so ever, not much room other than for storage, and they are not comfortable. I think that a Full 4 door model of the Ranger would be great, maybe a redesign will incorporate a backseat see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
The rear seats are very small but I did not buy it for rear seat comfort. I actually removed the seats to get more storage space behind the front seats. see full Ford Ranger review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Hatchbacks.
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.