Subaru Outback (2007) vs. Chevrolet Trax (2016) Specs

vs.

◆

2007 Subaru Outback and 2016 Chevrolet Trax Specifications

Model Year	2007	2016
Model	Subaru Outback	Chevrolet Trax
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr Wagon	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	105.1 in	100.6 in	4.5 in
Length	188.7 in	167.2 in	21.5 in
Width	69.7 in	69.9 in	-0.2 in
Height	63.2 in	65.9 in	-2.7 in
Curb Weight	3330 lb.	3048 lb.	282 lb.
Fuel Capacity	16.9 gal.	14.0 gal.	2.9 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	40.5 in	39.6 in	0.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	54.4 in	54.1 in	0.3 in
Hip Room, Row 1	51.0 in	51.7 in	-0.7 in
Legroom, Row 1	44.1 in	40.8 in	3.3 in
Headroom, Row 2	39.1 in	38.8 in	0.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	53.7 in	52.8 in	0.9 in
Hip Room, Row 2	52.6 in	50.7 in	1.9 in
Legroom, Row 2	33.9 in	35.7 in	-1.8 in
Total Legroom	78 in (over 2 rows)	76.5 in (over 2 rows)	1.5 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	33.5 ft³	18.7 ft³	14.8 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	66.2 ft³	48.4 ft³	17.8 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Subaru Outback

2007 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Footroom too short. see full Subaru Outback review
2008	4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	A little tight in the left portion of the footwell; small dead pedal. see full Subaru Outback review
2008	4dr Wagon 170-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	not long enough for a 6 foot 2 inch frame but I manage see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	I was amazed at how small the back seat is in this car. Really no bigger than a compact sedan, eg Civic or Corolla. I can't fit my 3 kids (in car seats) back there, and feel bad when co-workers pile in to go to lunch. Surprisingly small for a vehicle this size, and marketed as a "family car." If you plan to put adults or 3 kids back there regularly, look at the '10 or newer (or at something else -- the rear seat in my co-worker's Accord is far bigger and more comfortable). see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Leg and head room lacking for over 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2007	4dr Sedan 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Seat back a bit low for 6 footers. see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	Too small for kids see full Subaru Outback review
2006	4dr Wagon 175-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Too short! I am 6ft tall and the front passenger seat leaves me feeling very cramped. Drivers position is better. Seats also too narrow. Maybe plenty of room for skinny folks, but not for us folks that are large boned :-) see full Subaru Outback review

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax

2016 Chevrolet Trax Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	There's much more room inside the Trax than many people expect given its compact exterior. At 5-9, I could sit behind myself with a few inches of knee room to spare. But if the people in the front seats are taller than me, those in the back seat better be shorter. The Renegade and 500X have about the same amount of rear knee room as the Trax. They have a couple inches more shoulder room, though, so fitting three people in back is a little less of a squeeze. (It will still help if they enjoy physical contact with one another.) The Honda HR-V isn't wider, but does have a few more inches of rear legroom. On the other hand, the rear seats in the Nissan JUKE and MINI Countryman are tighter than that in the Trax. see full Chevrolet Trax review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Trax.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Wagons.

See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.