| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca and 2012 Chevrolet Spark Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | |
| Model | Subaru B9 Tribeca | Chevrolet Spark | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca
| 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough head room see full Subaru B9 Tribeca review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
| 2012 Chevrolet Spark Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Actually, just room. The firm, thinly padded rear seat provides minimal comfort. But there's more rear legroom than in quite a few larger cars. A Ford Focus, two size classes up, offers two fewer inches. Chevrolet's own Cruze offers just a few tenths of a inch more. see full Chevrolet Spark review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Spark.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.
