| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Subaru Tribeca and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2012 | |
| Model | Subaru Tribeca | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.2 in | 112.9 in | -4.7 in |
| Length | 191.5 in | 202.9 in | -11.4 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 76.2 in | -2.3 in |
| Height | 66.4 in | 60.7 in | 5.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 4140 lb. | 4015 lb. | 125 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -3.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 39.0 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.1 in | 57.9 in | 0.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.0 in | 56.3 in | -2.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 41.9 in | 0.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.2 in | 37.8 in | 0.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.5 in | 56.9 in | 0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.6 in | 55.8 in | -1.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.3 in | 38.1 in | -3.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 36.2 in | 0.0 in | 36.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 51.3 in | 0.0 in | 51.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 30.9 in | 0.0 in | 30.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.5 in (over 3 rows) | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 27.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.3 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | -11.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.6 ft3 | 20.1 | 17.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 74.4 ft3 | 20.1 ft3 | 54.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Subaru Tribeca
| 2009 Subaru Tribeca Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 256-horsepower 3.6L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
lots of legroom with adjustable rear seat. see full Subaru Tribeca review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.
