Model Year | 2012 | 2008 | |
Model | Subaru Tribeca | Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 108.2 in | 109.5 in | -1.3 in |
Length | 191.5 in | 186.6 in | 4.9 in |
Width | 73.9 in | 73.3 in | 0.6 in |
Height | 66.4 in | 67.7 in | -1.3 in |
Curb Weight | 4140 lb. | 4254 lb. | -114 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 20.8 gal. | -3.9 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 39.7 in | -0.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.1 in | 59.1 in | -1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.0 in | 57.6 in | -3.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 41.7 in | 0.6 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 38.2 in | 39.3 in | -1.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.5 in | 58.5 in | -1 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.6 in | 60.6 in | -6 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 34.3 in | 35.5 in | -1.2 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 36.2 in | 0.0 in | 36.2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 51.3 in | 0.0 in | 51.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 30.9 in | 0.0 in | 30.9 in |
Total Legroom | 107.5 in (over 3 rows) | 77.2 in (over 2 rows) | 30.3 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.3 ft3 | 34.5 ft3 | -26.2 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.6 ft3 | 34.5 | 3.1 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 74.4 ft3 | 67.4 ft3 | 7 ft3 |
2012 Subaru Tribeca Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 256-horsepower 3.6L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
enough leg room see full Subaru Tribeca review |
2008 Jeep Grand Cherokee Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 215hp 3.0L V6 Diesel 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
small, tight see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 235-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD w/low range |
That and MPG are the only real faults so far after 15000 miles and 15 mons. I think our 2001 GC has more seat comfort although the 07s seats do fold over easier than the 01s. see full Jeep Grand Cherokee review |