| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca and 2016 Nissan Murano Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2016 | |
| Model | Subaru B9 Tribeca | Nissan Murano | |
| Engine | 3.0L H6 DOHC-4v 250 hp@6600 219 lb-ft@4200 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 260 hp@6000 240 lb-ft@4400 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 7-speed shiftable CVT | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 108.2 in | 111.2 in | -3 in |
| Length | 189.8 in | 192.8 in | -3 in |
| Width | 73.9 in | 75.4 in | -1.5 in |
| Height | 66.4 in | 66.6 in | -0.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 4155 lb. | 3920 lb. | 235 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 16.9 gal. | 19.0 gal. | -2.1 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.9 in | 39.9 in | -1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.1 in | 59.6 in | -1.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.0 in | 54.8 in | -0.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 43.6 in | -1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.2 in | 39.8 in | -1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.5 in | 58.8 in | -1.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.6 in | 55.2 in | -0.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.3 in | 38.7 in | -4.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 36.2 in | 0.0 in | 36.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 51.3 in | 0.0 in | 51.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 30.9 in | 0.0 in | 30.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.5 in (over 3 rows) | 82.3 in (over 2 rows) | 25.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 8.3 ft3 | 39.6 ft3 | -31.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 37.6 ft3 | 39.6 | -2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 74.4 ft3 | 69.9 ft3 | 4.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca
| 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.0L H6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough head room see full Subaru B9 Tribeca review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano
| 2016 Nissan Murano Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | I nearly ranked the new Nissan Murano's front seats ahead of its styling as reasons to buy one. With form-fitting contours and cushy-yet-supportive construction "inspired by NASA," they're that good. I wasn't able to drive the Murano all day, but felt like I easily could have. The 2015 Ford Edge's driver seat didn't initially strike me as especially comfortable. It felt flatter and less luxurious than that in the Nissan. But over the course of my test drive it seemed to fit and support me better and better. By the end it seemed very comfortable, yet still not quite as good as the Nissan's. The Edge Titanium's seats have a sportier appearance and shape than the SEL's, and might provide more lateral support. see full Nissan Murano review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Nissan Murano.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.
