| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Subaru WRX and 2005 Toyota Celica Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2005 | |
| Model | Subaru WRX | Toyota Celica | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Subaru WRX
| 2017 Subaru WRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2016 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 268hp 2.0L H4 6-speed manual AWD |
Anyone whose owned a previous-gen WRX knows rear seat space, especially leg room, as "OK" at best. Subaru has revised the rear seats to where there is now more leg room for the lucky passengers in the rear. With the driver seat adjusted to how I sit (I'm 6-feet tall and have a more upright seating position), there is about 1.5 inches of space between my knees and the driver seat back (vs. no space on the previous gen!). Comfort is pretty good, although the seats take on more of a lean on the seat back, which may/may not jive well with your passengers backs. see full Subaru WRX review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2005 Toyota Celica
| 2005 Toyota Celica Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 2dr Hatch 180-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
I felt trapped in a box. It was just too tight. The door felt up against me -- too close. see full Toyota Celica review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Subaru models.
