| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Tesla Model 3 and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2012 | |
| Model | Tesla Model 3 | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.2 in | 98.4 in | 14.8 in |
| Length | 184.8 in | 161.6 in | 23.2 in |
| Width | 72.8 in | 66.7 in | 6.1 in |
| Height | 56.8 in | 60.0 in | -3.2 in |
| Curb Weight | 3549 lb. | 2496 lb. | 1053 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 0.0 gal. | 10.6 gal. | -10.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.6 in | 40.4 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.3 in | 52.7 in | 3.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 51.5 in | -51.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 41.3 in | 1.4 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.7 in | 39.0 in | -1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.0 in | 51.3 in | 2.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 51.3 in | -51.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.2 in | 34.5 in | 0.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.9 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 2.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 15.0 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -5.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.0 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -42.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Tesla Model 3
| 2017 Tesla Model 3 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2018 | 4dr Sedan 258-horsepower Electric 1-speed automatic RWD |
The 12 way power driver and passenger seats are very comfortable and the side bolstering is just right. The "vegan leather" in the car feels softer than real leather. I don't know how well it will hold up. My Prius has another type of this leather and that driver's seat has held up better than any leather seat I've sat in. see full Tesla Model 3 review |
| 2017 Tesla Model 3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2018 | 4dr Sedan 258-horsepower Electric 1-speed automatic RWD |
The back seat cushion is too low, which means there is no thigh support and your knees are level with your chest. There is also no foot room, but there is enough leg room. The rest of the backseat is comfortable, but the lack of foot room and low cushion are annoying. see full Tesla Model 3 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Tesla models.
