Model Year | 2012 | 2010 | |
Model | Tesla Model S | Toyota Highlander | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 116.5 in | 109.8 in | 6.7 in |
Length | 196.0 in | 188.4 in | 7.6 in |
Width | 77.3 in | 75.2 in | 2.1 in |
Height | 56.5 in | 68.1 in | -11.6 in |
Curb Weight | 4647 lb. | 3847 lb. | 800 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 0.0 gal. | 19.2 gal. | -19.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 40.6 in | -1.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.7 in | 59.7 in | -2 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.0 in | 56.7 in | -1.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.7 in | 43.2 in | -0.5 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 35.3 in | 40.1 in | -4.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.0 in | 59.5 in | -4.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.7 in | 56.5 in | -1.8 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 35.4 in | 38.3 in | -2.9 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 55.0 in | -55 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 42.3 in | -42.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 29.2 in | -29.2 in |
Total Legroom | 78.1 in (over 2 rows) | 110.7 in (over 3 rows) | -32.6 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 31.6 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 21.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 31.6 | 42.3 ft3 | -10.7 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 63.4 ft3 | 95.4 ft3 | -32 ft3 |
2012 Tesla Model S Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The front seats in the Tesla Model S are reasonably comfortable, but don't look or feel especially luxurious and provide little lateral support in turns. At least in the Performance model the side bolsters should be larger and/or adjustable. The seats in the A7 similarly need more aggressive bolsters. The seats in the S7 have them. see full Tesla Model S review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Tesla Model S.
2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2010 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Only two seats in the 2nd row, very small leg room in the 3rd row. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2009 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
seats were hard and flat. Even top of the line luxury model seats were a big disappointment . . . one of the principal reasons we did not choose this vehicle see full Toyota Highlander review |