| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Toyota 4Runner and 2017 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 114.8 in | -5 in |
| Length | 189.9 in | 195.5 in | -5.6 in |
| Width | 75.8 in | 74.7 in | 1.1 in |
| Height | 71.5 in | 57.9 in | 13.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 4400 lb. | 3997 lb. | 403 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 24.0 gal. | 18.8 gal. | 5.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.3 in | 38.7 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 59.1 in | -1.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 57.2 in | -0.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.3 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 38.0 in | 0.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 59.0 in | -1.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.7 in | 58.0 in | -2.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.9 in | 39.7 in | -6.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 34.3 in | 0.0 in | 34.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.7 in | 0.0 in | 57.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.3 in | 0.0 in | 29.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 103.9 in (over 3 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 21.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.0 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | -7.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 46.3 ft3 | 16.4 | 29.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 88.8 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 72.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota 4Runner
| 2012 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
