Model Year | 2008 | 2014 | |
Model | Toyota 4Runner | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
Engine | 4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 236 hp@5200 266 lb-ft@4000 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 320 hp@5400 335 lb-ft@4000 |
|
Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | 4WD w/low range | 4WD w/low range | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 116.0 in | -6.2 in |
Length | 189.2 in | 202.0 in | -12.8 in |
Width | 75.2 in | 79.0 in | -3.8 in |
Height | 69.3 in | 76.9 in | -7.6 in |
Curb Weight | 4300 lb. | 5567 lb. | -1267 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 23.0 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -3 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 41.1 in | -1.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.0 in | 65.3 in | -7.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 64.4 in | -9.1 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 41.3 in | 0.5 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.1 in | 39.2 in | -0.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 65.2 in | -8 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 60.6 in | -5.2 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 34.6 in | 39.0 in | -4.4 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 32.9 in | 37.9 in | -5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 56.7 in | 61.7 in | -5 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.4 in | 49.1 in | -0.7 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 24.1 in | 25.6 in | -1.5 in |
Total Legroom | 100.5 in (over 3 rows) | 105.9 in (over 3 rows) | -5.4 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 16.9 ft3 | -4.9 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 36.6 ft3 | 60.3 ft3 | -23.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 75.1 ft3 | 108.9 ft3 | -33.8 ft3 |
2008 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
not enough leg room see full Toyota 4Runner review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
This is a vehicle designed for people 5 fett 11 inches and under - no two ways about it. If you are 5 feel 11 or over you will not enjoy this truck. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
The consequence of reducing overall height while maintaining trail worthy obstacle clearance is a relatively low to floor seating position more attune to sedans. Seats are comfortable though even for a big framed person. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Seat position low to floor leaves you sitting with a knee high position. Seats itself are comfortable, but there is no space for your feet under the front seats. All floor surfaces are almost flat though considering it truck roots. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Not a power seat. Cannot get it into an optimum adjustment. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
No third row, cargo space small see full Toyota 4Runner review |
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.