| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota 4Runner and 2016 Chrysler 200 Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Chrysler 200 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 108.0 in | 1.8 in |
| Length | 189.9 in | 192.3 in | -2.4 in |
| Width | 75.8 in | 73.6 in | 2.2 in |
| Height | 71.5 in | 58.7 in | 12.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4400 lb. | 3473 lb. | 927 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 24.0 gal. | 15.8 gal. | 8.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.3 in | 37.7 in | 1.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 58.5 in | -0.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 54.5 in | 2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.2 in | -0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 37.4 in | 1.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 56.7 in | 1.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.7 in | 52.7 in | 3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.9 in | 37.6 in | -4.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 34.3 in | 0.0 in | 34.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.7 in | 0.0 in | 57.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.3 in | 0.0 in | 29.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 103.9 in (over 3 rows) | 79.8 in (over 2 rows) | 24.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.0 ft3 | 16.0 ft3 | -7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 46.3 ft3 | 16.0 | 30.3 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 88.8 ft3 | 16.0 ft3 | 72.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota 4Runner
| 2011 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200
| 2016 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chrysler 200.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
