| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Toyota 4Runner and 2014 Chrysler 200 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2014 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Chrysler 200 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,766 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,823 mm | 4,869 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 1,537 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 64 L | 27 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,019 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 975 mm | 5 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 919 mm | -83 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,996 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 385 L | -130 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 13.6 | -12.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 13.6 | -11.6 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota 4Runner
| 2012 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chrysler 200
| 2014 Chrysler 200 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Chrysler 200 shares its basic structure with the compact Dodge Dart. This basis is most evident in the back seat, where legroom is decent but hiproom is considerably tighter than in most midsize sedans. Thanks to the stylish roof line, rear headroom is also in short supply. The Fusion's rear seat isn't nearly the roomiest in the class, but it is roomier and more comfortable than the Chrysler's. If you need a truly roomy rear seat and all-wheel-drive in a somewhat affordable midsize sedan, buy the Legacy. see full Chrysler 200 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chrysler 200
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chrysler 200.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
