| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Toyota 4Runner and 2013 Ford C-MAX Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Ford C-MAX | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 104.3 in | 5.5 in |
| Length | 189.9 in | 173.6 in | 16.3 in |
| Width | 75.8 in | 72.0 in | 3.8 in |
| Height | 71.5 in | 63.9 in | 7.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 4400 lb. | 3607 lb. | 793 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 24.0 gal. | 13.5 gal. | 10.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.3 in | 41.0 in | -1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 55.9 in | 1.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.5 in | 54.3 in | 2.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 40.4 in | 1.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.6 in | 39.4 in | -0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.8 in | 55.2 in | 2.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.7 in | 51.9 in | 3.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.9 in | 36.5 in | -3.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 34.3 in | 0.0 in | 34.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.7 in | 0.0 in | 57.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 43.3 in | 0.0 in | 43.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.3 in | 0.0 in | 29.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 103.9 in (over 3 rows) | 76.9 in (over 2 rows) | 27 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 9.0 ft3 | 24.5 ft3 | -15.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 46.3 ft3 | 24.5 | 21.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 88.8 ft3 | 52.6 ft3 | 36.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota 4Runner
| 2012 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
| 2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
